Small tidbits and Sparks of wisdom

This is a conservative, diversified $10 million investment structure built for stability over long horizons with clear historical footing across 20- and 30-year periods. It places 60% into high-quality dividend-paying equities for steady growth, 25% into long-term Treasuries to anchor the portfolio during equity stress, 5% into true cash reserves for liquidity, and 5% into a permanent hedge using protective options or inverse exposure. The purpose is straightforward: protect principal, reduce drawdowns, and allow disciplined, defensive positioning to compound consistently across multi-decade cycles.

Good — I ran a concrete, numbers-forward estimate using your Scenario 5 adjusted so the “cash” slice is 5% of $10M and that 5% is split 30/30/40 into WL / IUL / VUL. I used realistic historical proxies for each asset class and spelled every assumption out so you can judge the result.

Short answer — $10M put into this modified Scenario 5, held historically:

20-year outcome (historical proxy) → ≈ $58.2 million.

30-year outcome (historical proxy) → ≈ $135.4 million.


Those are nominal totals (no taxes, no fees) based on the assumptions below. Read the assumptions — they materially change the answer.


—

What I assumed (and why)

I used the same Scenario 5 core but changed the cash piece to your requested split:

Portfolio weights (final):

Dividend/defensive stocks — 60%

Long-term Treasuries — 25%

Cash (True cash, e.g., short short-term instruments) — 5%

Protective puts / hedge drag — 5%

Insurance composite (total 5%), broken into: Whole Life 1.5%, IUL 1.5%, VUL 2% (that is 30/30/40 of the 5%).


Key annualized return inputs used (historical proxies / conservative estimates):

Stocks (S&P proxy / long-term dividend-quality exposure): 20-yr: 11.095% ; 30-yr: 10.439% (these are historical S&P total-return style numbers used as the equity proxy).

Long-term Treasuries (20-yr / 30-yr proxy): 20-yr: 4.0% ; 30-yr: 5.0% (based on long-Treasury yield history and long-Treasury fund returns).

Cash: 1.0% (short cash proxy).

Protective puts / inverse hedge: net drag –1.5% p.a. (insurance/put costs and time-decay; illustrative).

Whole Life (blended / high-PUA design): 20-yr: 5.5% ; 30-yr: 5.8% (industry historical IRR ranges for well-designed participating WL).

Indexed UL credited (IUL): ~5.5%–6.0% depending on crediting (I used 5.5% for 20yr, 6.0% for 30yr). (IULs’ look-back historic credited numbers often sit in the mid-single digits; see carrier look-backs).

Variable UL (VUL): treated like equities (used same equity proxy above). Performance varies by subaccount; this is a proxy.


I computed compounding with those annualized rates and the weights above to produce the totals. This is a back-test style arithmetic projection using historical average annualized returns — not a guarantee.


—

Full numeric breakdown (per asset) — nominal totals

20-year totals (sum ≈ $58,181,744)

Stocks (60%) → ≈ $49.21M.

Treasuries (25%) → ≈ $5.48M.

Cash (5%) → ≈ $0.61M.

Hedge/puts (5%, drag) → ≈ $0.37M.

WL (1.5%) → ≈ $0.44M.

IUL (1.5%) → ≈ $0.44M.

VUL (2%) → ≈ $1.64M.


30-year totals (sum ≈ $135,389,492)

Stocks (60%) → ≈ $117.98M.

Treasuries (25%) → ≈ $10.80M.

Cash (5%) → ≈ $0.67M.

Hedge/puts (5%) → ≈ $0.32M.

WL (1.5%) → ≈ $0.81M.

IUL (1.5%) → ≈ $0.86M.

VUL (2%) → ≈ $3.93M.



—

Important caveats — read these carefully

1. Very sensitive to the equity number. Stocks dominate outcomes. Small differences in the assumed equity CAGR produce big changes in 20–30 year totals. The numbers above used recent historical equity returns; different start/end windows matter.


2. Insurance returns are policy-specific. WL, IUL and VUL performance depends on carrier scale, dividend scale, crediting formulas, fees, and whether the policy is funded/structured optimally. I used conservative, illustrative industry proxies; your actual policy could be meaningfully higher or lower.


3. Protective puts are costly over long periods. The assumed –1.5% drag is illustrative—active hedging strategies, synthetic hedges, or dynamic overlays change this figure meaningfully.


4. No taxes, no policy loans, no fees, no commissions, no rebalancing friction included. Real net results will be lower.


5. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Markets and policy crediting can change.




—

If you want this tightened up / next steps

I can immediately (no waiting):

Run a sensitivity table (e.g., equity CAGR 8% / 10% / 12% across 20 & 30 years).

Show alternative splits: WL =10% vs 5% vs 0% and how it changes totals.

Replace the S&P proxy with Dividend-Aristocrats specific returns (if you want that closer match).

Produce the same outputs after estimated taxes and advisor/commission drag.


Tell me which variation and I’ll run the numbers and show the table right away. No fluff — just the math.