Small tidbits and Sparks of wisdom

Throughout history, one question continues to resurface:
If Judaism is true—if the Torah is the divine blueprint for the universe—why are the Jewish people such a small minority?
Why do most of the world’s people follow other religions—Christianity, Islam, secularism—while Torah Jews remain a fraction of a percent of humanity?

This very question was once posed by a Roman official to one of the great sages of the Talmud. He asked, “If your Torah is true, why are you so few? Why doesn’t the majority follow your way?”
The sage responded with clarity: “We only follow the majority in cases of doubt. When we are unsure—when the halachic status of something is unclear—we defer to the majority of qualified judges. But when we know something with certainty, majority becomes irrelevant. Truth is not decided by a vote.”

That answer strikes at the heart of the flaw in majority logic: the majority is usually wrong because it operates in the dark.

Majorities, by their nature, tend to be outsiders to truth. They lack the full picture. They make judgments based on partial information, feelings, or social consensus. But truth—real truth—requires insider knowledge.

Think of a king’s palace. Outside, the crowds may chatter, debate, and speculate about what’s going on behind the gates. But only the king’s advisors—the insiders—know the real plan. The decisions, the secrets, the strategy—all are hidden from public view. The crowd may feel confident in their guesses, but confidence without knowledge is dangerous.

So too, the sages of Torah are the insiders. They hold the scroll of truth handed down at Sinai. They live by divine wisdom, not popular opinion. The Torah was not presented in a public square for a global vote. It was given to a nation that was chosen, refined, and bound by covenant. The world never had that access.

The majority judges based on appearances. They see a few million Jews and assume they must be wrong, simply because they are outnumbered. But the minority has the truth—and the weight of history, prophecy, and divine transmission on its side.

The rule of majority is only useful when there is doubt. But when there is certainty, numbers are meaningless.

Judaism doesn’t suffer from the confusion of doubt. We don’t believe in Torah because it’s emotionally appealing or culturally convenient. We live by it because it was revealed with clarity—by the Creator, to a nation, in open sight. The nations of the world, by contrast, follow what seems right or feels right, not what is right.

That is why the Jewish people do not fear being few.
We were never meant to be popular.
We were meant to be right.

—

A simple way to understand why the majority is so often wrong is through the example of a family. Picture a father and mother with four children of varying ages. If decisions were made purely by majority vote, and the four children voted in favor of candy for dinner, screen time all night, or skipping school—would that make it right? Of course not. The parents, though they are the minority, carry the responsibility, experience, and long-term vision for the home. They listen to the children, but they don’t surrender truth to their whims. The same applies to society. Today, the majority is often composed of the uninformed, impulsive, and easily manipulated—led by media, trends, fear, and ideology. They chase whatever is marketed next: Marxism, Mein Kampf, radical liberalism, or extremist dogmas wrapped in social slogans. Noise becomes consensus, and consensus becomes chaos. But truth is not a popularity contest, and those who see through the illusion must lead—even if they are few.

The Flawed Foundation of American Democracy

The concept of majority rule in democracy is, in theory, a brilliant one—if the population has a shared sense of values, responsibility, and purpose. When the people voting are mature, balanced, and living by some moral compass, democracy can function. But when the crowd is confused, fragmented, or self-serving, majority rule becomes a path to destruction.

Unfortunately, the Founding Fathers, for all their wisdom, made a tragic oversight in the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights: they failed to clearly define who should be considered a citizen with full democratic rights. There should have been a threshold—a baseline of age, contribution, and ethical alignment. For example, only those over 25, with some record of work, family life, and civic participation, regardless of race or religion, should have been granted full voting power.

Without these moral and structural boundaries, America opened itself up to a flood of entitlement, identity politics, and lawless behavior. People were given rights without responsibilities. And when you promise equality to all without requiring effort, discipline, or shared values, you create chaos—exactly what we see now.

Had the Constitution embedded Judeo-Christian moral expectations, and honored the concept that rights must come with responsibility, the woke liberal agenda would never have taken root. Equality before God and man is a beautiful idea—but only when anchored in a coherent moral framework.

—

The Danger of Unchecked Equality

The Democratic Party—especially in its modern form—has taken advantage of this vacuum. It grants power to those who contribute nothing, empowers ideologies that oppose America’s own founding ethos, and undermines the very fabric of the nation. The result is a divided, unstable, and morally confused society.

Today’s America is a battleground between two irreconcilable visions: one rooted in faith, family, and tradition; the other in moral relativism, self-indulgence, and ideological tyranny. This is not a policy disagreement. It’s a spiritual conflict.

The soft civil war is already here—fought with ballots, bureaucracy, lawsuits, and social shaming. But if the trajectory continues, it may not remain soft for long.

—

The Talmudic Wisdom America Missed

Had the Founders consulted the Torah sages, they would have learned that majority rule only applies when there is genuine uncertainty. When truth is clear and absolute—as in the case of moral law, family structure, and divine expectation—the crowd does not get a say. Decisions must be entrusted to those who know.

In conclusion, the Founding Fathers should have sought counsel from the Torah world. They could have built a nation where democracy works only within bounds, where equality is honored but responsibility is required, and where truth is upheld not by the loudest voice but by the wisest mind.

It is not the majority that secures a future—it is the minority who know the truth with certainty, and are willing to live and lead by it.